People v. Calvin S.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HULL, J.
In the published portion of this decision, we hold the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States does not preclude the collection of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) samples in accordance with Penal Code section 296, subdivision (a)(1) from a juvenile who is adjudicated under section 602 of the Welfare and Institutions Code for committing a felony. In the unpublished portion of the decision, we decide the juvenile court did not abuse its discretion when it found good cause to continue the jurisdictional hearing. We affirm the judgment.
Facts and Proceedings
On August…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Loder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. Jose C.California Supreme Court · 2009
- People v. Lakisha M.Illinois Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- F. v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.