People v. Jose C.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 purports to give our state courts jurisdiction to declare any juvenile who “violates any law ... of the United States” a ward of the court. (Id., subd. (a).) However, Congress has granted federal courts “original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of all offenses against the laws of the United States.” (18 U.S.C. § 3231.) We consider whether, under the United States Constitution’s supremacy clause, section 3231 or any other provision of federal law preempts Welfare and Institutions Code section 602.
We conclude…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Plyler v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Howlett Ex Rel. Howlett v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- People v. Ricardo P. (In Re Ricardo P.)California Supreme Court · 2019
- Rose v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Wang v. Chinese Daily News, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Friends of Eel River v. North Coast Ry. Auth.California Supreme Court · 2017
- Brown v. MortensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.