Legal Opinion
F. v. Brown
Kentucky Supreme Court
Decided March 18, 2010No. 2008-SC-000213-DGPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Justice SCHRODER.
Appellants are juveniles adjudicated public offenders for various sex offenses. 1 They argue that the 2002 versions of Kentucky’s DNA sampling statutes 2 do not require them to submit DNA for inclusion in a state and national database. Appel lants also present constitutional and administrative challenges to the statutes. Appellee is Commissioner of the Department of Juvenile Justice (DJJ), which implemented directives and policies to sample DNA from certain juveniles under its custody or control. For the reasons that follow, we reject Appellants’…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Jefferson County Board of Education v. Fell ex rel. L.F.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
- Abel v. AustinKentucky Supreme Court · 2013
- Mario W. v. Hon. kaipio/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
- Wade v. Poma Glass & Specialty Windows, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.