Legal Opinion

People v. King

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 2000No. A079943PublishedCited by 27 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STEIN, J.

On May 28, 1997, a jury returned a verdict finding appellant James Edward King guilty of murder with special circumstances, first degree burglary, sodomy and attempted rape. The jury did not, however, find that appellant’s crimes warranted the death penalty. The trial court accordingly sentenced appellant to life in prison without the possibility of parole consecutive to a determinate term of 30 years.

In appealing his conviction and sentence, appellant does not deny that he in fact committed the crimes. He contends, rather, that the jury’s findings were based on inadmissible…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. In re D.L.C.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. People v. TravisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API