Finkelstein v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance of Boston
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtO’Malley, J.
Here is involved the construction of disability provisions in a policy of life insurance. Plaintiff’s right to recover is predicated on a provision which gives him certain rights in the event that he has “ become totally disabled as the result of bodily injury or disease so as to be wholly prevented thereby from engaging in any occupation or employment for wage or profit.”
Plaintiff is a glazier by trade. He has never been engaged in any other business or occupation. While handling a heavy pane of plate glass he sustained a serious injury to his right arm. His proof was sufficient to justify a…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Garms v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Garms v. Travelers Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
3Cited by6 opinions
- Shabotzky v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- Waldman v. Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- Luftig v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
- Muzio v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Steingart v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.