Legal Opinion

Garms v. Travelers Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 3, 1934PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, J.

On May 8, 1924, the defendant issued to the plaintiff a policy of accident insurance which was renewable from year to year and which provided that the defendant would pay to the *231plaintiff certain stated benefits should the plaintiff be disabled within the meaning of the policy and under the circumstances set forth therein.

On June 11, 1925, a policy of life insurance was issued by the defendant to the plaintiff, containing a provision entitling the plaintiff to a disability income.

The plaintiff met with a serious injury and demanded payment under the above policies. The demand having been…

2Cited by27 opinions

  1. McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Erreca v. Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  4. Williams v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  5. Hurwit v. Prudential I. Co. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API