Legal Opinion

Steingart v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 27, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The evidence fully justified a finding that the injury sustained by the insured to his right hand was not of such a character as to prevent him “ from engaging in any business or occupation and performing any work for compensation or profit ” (italics ours), as provided in the policy sued upon. .

Under the rule recently enunciated in this department in Garms v. Travelers Insurance Co. (242 App. Div. 230; affd., 266 N. Y. 446), decided prior to the trial herein, and in Finkelstein v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. (247 App. Div. 74), decided after the determination of the Appellate…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garms v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  2. Garms v. Travelers Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Finkelstein v. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance of BostonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frad v. Columbian Nat. Life Ins.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API