Legal Opinion
In Re Discipline of Devers
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 29, 1993No. OSB 89445; SC S39997PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Per curiam
This is a lawyer discipline proceeding involving “reciprocal discipline” under Bar Rule of Procedure (BR) 3.5. The accused is a lawyer who was licensed to practice law in both Oregon and Michigan during the years relevant to this proceeding. He presently lives in Oregon. In 1992, the accused was suspended from the practice of law in Michigan for four months for unethical conduct in three matters, which we discuss more fully below. Pursuant to BR 3.5, the State Professional Responsibility Board has recommended that the accused be suspended from the practice of law in Oregon for his unethical…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Windsor v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- In Re Pioneer Warehouse Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1979
3Cited by17 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SabghirCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- In Re Complaint as to Conduct of DeversOregon Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of CohenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of AltstattOregon Supreme Court · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.