Legal Opinion

Morse v. Byam

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1885PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Error to Genesee. (Newton, J.) Ejectment. Plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

This is an action of ejectment to recover •two forty-acre lots of land in the township of Montrose, ■Genesee county.

The two lots were purchased of the Government by Dudley Gilman in 1854. In 1866, Gilman sold and conveyed them to his son William, who two years later sold .and conveyed to the plaintiff Morse. Morse leased the land to one Cole who went into possession, but five or six years later repudiated the tenancy, and notified Morse he had purchased the land of one Cotharin. Morse took no action -at the time to enforce his rights against Cole, but in 1880 he *596deeded an undivided half of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wagar v. StoneMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Caruthers v. HumphreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Lee v. ClaryMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Reading v. WatermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Nims v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kubczak v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Moncrieff v. HareSupreme Court of Colorado · 1906
  3. Shaw v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Croskery v. BuschMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. v. SuttonMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API