Legal Opinion

Kubczak v. Chemical Bank & Trust Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1998No. 105755, Calendar No. 6PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.

In this premises liability action, we consider whether defendant-appellant Chemical Bank, as the mortgagee and nominal owner during the mortgage foreclosure redemption period, should be considered a “possessor” for purposes of premises liability. In the present case, plaintiff-appellee realtor was injured while showing the foreclosed property during the statutory right of redemption period. Her ensuing premises liability action resulted in judgment against defendant-appellant Chemical Bank, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. We find that the bank was not a “possessor” of the property and,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mulholland v. DEC International Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Nezworski v. MazanecMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Merritt v. NickelsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Orel v. Uni-Rak Sales Co., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Morse v. ByamMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Chambers v. Trettco, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Hord v. Environmental Research InstituteMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Chiles v. Machine Shop, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. People v. MarchMichigan Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Farm Credit Services v. WeldonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API