Croskery v. Busch
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Gladwin; Sbarpe, J. Bill by Robert Croskery and James Croskery, Jr., against William C. Busch and Jane A. Busch to enforce a lien upon land for taxes and improvements. From a decree for complainants, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The complainants claim to have taken possession under a purchase of State tax lands, sold for the taxes of 1889. Upon being dispossessed, they filed the bill in this suit to recover under section 104 of Act No. 206 of the Public Acts of 1893 for improvements made upon the premises, and to recover the amount paid as purchase price of said lands, and for taxes subsequently becoming a charge thereon. Three questions require consideration, — the first relating to the purchase price; second,, other taxes paid; and, third, the right to receive compensation for improvements.
The complainants’ claim…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Flinn v. ParsonsIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
- Everett v. BeebeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1873
- Nims v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Light v. WestSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Morse v. ByamMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Van Wagoner v. WhitmoreUtah Supreme Court · 1921
- Corrigan v. HinkleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Holmes v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
- Brewer v. Folsom Bros. Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Morrison v. SemerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.