Legal Opinion

Nims v. Sherman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1880PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Error to Ingham. Ejectment. Defendant brings e.rror.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

This was a special proceeding before a circuit court commissioner to recover possession of lands. It was appealed to and tried in the circuit court where Sherman, who was complainant, recovered judgment. It is now brought to this court by writ of error on exceptions.

Sherman derives his title by deed from one Wheaton bearing date June 17, 1878. At this date Elms was in *47possession, and had been in possession, for a year and a half or thereabouts. It was shown on the trial and was not disputed, that Wheaton’s title was derived through the foreclosure of a mortgage in chancery, which was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Hayes v. LivingstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Martin v. McReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Ryerson v. EldredMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Scott v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1874

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Harding v. GillettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Costello v. CunninghamArizona Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Morse v. ByamMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Kerschensteiner v. Northern Michigan Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Day v. WaldenMichigan Supreme Court · 1881

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API