Legal Opinion

Curry v. Thornsberry

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided February 26, 2003No. CA 02-583PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Larry D. Vaught, Judge.

Appellants Howard Curry and his wife Linda, sued appellees William Thornsberry and his wife Delores, the builder and original seller of appellants’ home, for damages allegedly caused by appellees during construction. The trial court directed a verdict against appellants at the close of their proof, finding insufficient evidence of fraudulent concealment so as to toll the statute of limitations. The trial court also awarded appellees a portion of their attorney fees under Ark. Code Ann. § 16-22-308 (1999). Appellants bring this appeal challenging both rulings. We affirm.

A…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Chrisco v. Sun Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
  2. Adams v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  3. Wawak v. StewartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  4. Martin v. ArthurSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. Shelton Ex Rel. Piccirilli v. FiserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2000

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Maycock v. Asilomar Development, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
  2. Russo v. Southern Developers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. Dunn v. WomackCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2011
  4. Nissan North America, Inc. v. HarlanCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  5. Henderson v. HarbisonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API