Newman v. Solt
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
FRICKE, J., pro tem.
Respondent was injured while riding as a guest of appellant Earl M. Ross in an automobile belonging to appellant Margaret Solt. The complaint alleged that the injuries sustained were caused by the negligence and careless operation of the automobile and the wilful misconduct of appellant Ross. The trial court directed a verdict in favor of Margaret Solt and the jury returned a verdict in favor of both appellants. Thereafter the court granted a motion for new trial as to both appellants, from which order this appeal is taken.
According to the testimony of respondent, on the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
3Cited by7 opinions
- Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Elmore v. County of LassenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
- Clatsop County v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1941
- Jones v. HathwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Katz v. KuppinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.