Legal Opinion

Jones v. Hathway

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 13, 1937No. Civ. 11292PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, P. J.

The pertinent facts herein appear to be that a Mr. John Hansen was the owner of an automobile, in which he transported his wife, plaintiff and defendant from the city of Santa Barbara to the city of Los Angeles. After' the party had arrived in the vicinity of the latter city, for the asserted reason that defendant was better acquainted with the streets thereof than was the owner of the automobile, “Hansen turned the wheel over to Hathway, and from that time on Hathway was the driver of the car”, not only while within the city of Los Angeles, but also including the time occupied on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Meek v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Howard v. HowardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Helme v. Great Western Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Turner v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Norton v. PuterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Porter v. HofmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Van Fleet v. HeylerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Wright v. SellersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  4. Chandler v. QuinlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API