Legal Opinion
State v. Carroll
Washington Supreme Court
Decided November 21, 1973No. 42707PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHamilton, J.
In 1971, a grand jury was convened in King County for the purpose of investigating possible bribery and corruption among police and public officials. As a result of such investigations, several indictments issued. .The six defendants-respondents1 in the instant matter were subpoenaed to attend upon and did testify under oath before the grand jury. Each was advised, before testifying, of: (a) the purpose of the investigation, (b) their right to counsel, and (c) their right to remain silent.
*111Respondents were subsequently indicted. Each was charged with offenses in the nature of or offending…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Brown v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. SinitoOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Eastham v. ArndtCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- State v. MufichSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.