State v. Mufich
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
This case presents the question of whether the state of Kansas may compel testimony from an unwilling witness, who invokes the constitutional privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, when witness immunity from prosecution or punishment is conferred by the state as provided in K. S. A. 22-3415 (Weeks).
The question arose under the following circumstances. Ed Mufich was charged with commercial gambling. The appellant Paul Birdsong was called as a state witness at the preliminary hearing and refused to respond to questions, claiming a…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- State v. DurrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
- Farmers Co-Operative v. Kansas Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- Coleman v. Brotherhood State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. KalbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.