Legal Opinion

State v. Mufich

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 1, 1975No. 47,394PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Fromme, J.:

This case presents the question of whether the state of Kansas may compel testimony from an unwilling witness, who invokes the constitutional privilege against compulsory self-incrimination, when witness immunity from prosecution or punishment is conferred by the state as provided in K. S. A. 22-3415 (Weeks).

The question arose under the following circumstances. Ed Mufich was charged with commercial gambling. The appellant Paul Birdsong was called as a state witness at the preliminary hearing and refused to respond to questions, claiming a…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SwinehartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. State v. DurrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. Farmers Co-Operative v. Kansas Board of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  4. Coleman v. Brotherhood State BankCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  5. State Ex Rel. Sanborn v. KalbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API