Legal Opinion

Eastham v. Arndt

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 2, 1981No. 7381-8-IPublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCallow, J.

The appellant, Ferdnand M. Arndt, appeals an order adjudging him guilty of contempt of court entered for his refusal, on Fifth Amendment grounds, to obey a trial court order to answer certain questions asked him in proceedings supplemental to a judgment. Three issues are presented: (1) whether the immunity granted in RCW 6.32-.200 is adequate to justify the compulsion of a person's testimony over his claim of Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination; (2) whether the appellant has made a sufficient showing that his answers to questions might tend to incriminate him so as to enable…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Counselman v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. State v. HobbleWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  2. King v. Olympic Pipe Line Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Seventh Elect Church in Israel v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  5. State v. CarlisleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API