Fritz v. Howard Township
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Summary judgment was granted to Township in personal injury action brought by motorist injured on unmarked, unguarded, washed-out township road. The trial court ruled that 1) Township met its duty by posting a warning sign, and 2) unless Township had actual knowledge that the sign was missing, it owed no farther duty to the plaintiff. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Joanne Farke is the clerk for the Howard Township Board of Township Supervisors (Board) in Charles Mix County. On a Sunday afternoon in February of 1994, a township resident telephoned Farke at…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- City of Colton v. SchwebachSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Walz v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Lamp v. First National Bank of GarretsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Bauman v. AuchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Strassburg v. Citizens State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Estate of Shuck v. Perkins CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Hansen v. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Willoughby v. GrimSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Knodel v. Kassel TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.