Walz v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] Insured brought an action against Insurer for bad faith in denying workers’ compensation benefits. Insured claims Insurer inadequately investigated the circumstances surrounding the injury and ignored pertinent case authority submitted by Insured. Summary judgment was granted to Insurer and Insured appeals. We reverse and remand for trial.
FACTS
[¶ 2] At the time of her injury, Carole Walz (Walz) had been employed by Ultimate Direction of South Dakota, Inc. (Employer) for nearly two years. She had fixed hours of employment from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Continental InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. SavioSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- State, Department of Revenue v. ThiewesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Isaac v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Universe Life Insurance v. GilesTexas Supreme Court · 1997
- Spenner v. CITY OF SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTASouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad v. AcuitySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Steinberg v. South Dakota Department of Military & Veterans AffairsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Daniel Athey v. Farmers Insurance Exchangeillinois Farmers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.