Legal Opinion

Bauman v. Auch

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1995No. 18564PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BASTIAN, Circuit Judge.

Robert and Melanie Bauman (plaintiffs), appeal the trial court’s refusal to grant their motion for directed verdict, motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, and motion for new trial. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Robert Bauman (Bob) was injured on June 5,1989, when the horse he was riding reared up as he attempted to mount her, throwing him to the ground. The horse, Krissy, was owned by Bob’s father, Garfield Bauman (Garfield), who is now deceased. Prior to his death, Garfield was the defendant in this action.

In 1979, Bob and his wife…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Sommervold v. GrevlosSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Dartt v. BerghorstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Westover v. East River Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Gerlach v. Ethan Coop Lumber Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Schaffer v. Edward D. Jones & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Thompson v. SummersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Bland v. Davison CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API