Legal Opinion

Bigelow v. Walraven

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1974No. 5 May Term 1974, Docket Nos. 54,920, 54,921PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.

My colleague, Mr. Justice Thomas Giles Kavanagh, would hold that a trial judge may condition an order setting aside a default, entered following defendant’s failure to answer a complaint, on defendant not pleading the statute of limitations.

He states that a condition depriving defendant of the defense of the statute of limitations is not "wholly arbitrary and unreasonable” because the statute of limitations itself establishes an arbitrary deadline; a trial judge does not act arbitrarily or unreasonably in relieving a plaintiff of a failure to meet an "arbitrarily established deadline” so that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. Ben P. Fyke & Sons v. Gunter Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  4. F. M. Slagle & Co. v. BushnellSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  5. LaBar v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1965

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Gebhardt v. O'ROURKEMichigan Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Lothian v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Moll v. Abbott LaboratoriesMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Driver v. NainiMichigan Supreme Court · 2011

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API