F. M. Slagle & Co. v. Bushnell
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.
This appeal by plaintiff, in an action wherein it sought to recover from defendant a balance of about $1,200 for lumber, coal, and supplies delivered to defendant during a period extending from 1926 to 1937, confronts us with questions we propose to separately state and decide.
The defense of the statute of limitations, SDC 33.0232(4), was pleaded by way of amendment to the answer. The plaintiff contends that the record reveals a manifest abuse of discretion by the trial court in allowing the amendment.
The action was commenced, in September, 1939. The complaint included an exhibit which…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Tayloe v. T. & S. SandifordSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
- Davenport v. StrattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Crow v. . GleasonNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Wrightson v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. McCaffertySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Bigelow v. WalravenMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. WedemannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. SielerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- Dacy v. GorsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.