Legal Opinion

Calhoun v. Ryals

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 3, 1924No. 3852PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

The controlling question in the case arises under , the grounds of the motion for a new trial, and is as to the sufficiency *45of the two deeds executed by J. E. Mobley, one to his son E. H. Mobley, and the other to his daughter Mrs. Abbie Calhoun. -In his rulings on the admissibility of evidence and in his charge to the jury the judge held both deeds in their present form to be void on account of insufficient description of land attempted to be conveyed. The descriptive clauses in each deed were sufficient, and the judge erred in holding the deeds void. The deed to Mrs. Calhoun purported to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Huntress v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. McSwain v. RicketsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. Glover v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  4. Glover v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Glover v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Crider v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Jackson v. SandersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
  3. Durden v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Prudential Insurance v. HillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  5. Wardlaw v. WardlawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API