Legal Opinion
Crider v. Woodward
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided September 23, 1926No. 5086PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.
The defendant Mrs. Crider offered an amendment to her plea, in which it was alleged that the plaintiff’s right to recover the land had previously been adjudicated against her in the following manner, that is to say, that the plaintiff claimed the land as an heir at law of Mrs. Mary D. Howell, deceased; that the plaintiff is also an heir at law of Clark Howell, deceased; that at the December term, 1889, of the court of ordinary the administrators with the will annexed of Clark Howell petitioned for leave to sell the land in controversy, for the purpose of distribution among the heirs, praying…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Dix v. DixSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Andrews v. MurphySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
- Huntress v. PortwoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Flannery & Co. v. HightowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Price v. GrossSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Huggins v. MeriweatherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
- Hightower v. Blakely Hardwood Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1927
- Nuckolls v. MerrittSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Martin v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.