Legal Opinion

Prudential Insurance v. Hill

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided May 16, 1930No. 7503PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHines, J.

1. Whore an intestate died seized and possessed of a tract of land which his administrator, for the purpose of sale, had surveyed and subdivided into five separate tracts designated in the subdivision by numbers from 1 to 5, and where tract No. 1 was sold and conveyed by the administrator to A. J. Orr, and where tract No. 2 was sold and , conveyed by the administrator to Fanning and Granade, said purchasers taking possession of and cultivating their respective tracts of land up to the dividing line between them, and where Fanning and Granade afterwards sold and conveyed their tract to Orr,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crider v. WoodwardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
  2. Swint v. SwintSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Blackwell v. PartridgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1923
  4. Durden v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  5. Marshall v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Deaton v. SwansonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Gainesville Midland Railroad v. TynerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  3. Barber v. Housing Authority of RomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1939
  4. Smith v. Federal Land BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  5. Bibb County v. ElkanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API