Ballas v. Ballas

VALLÉE, J.

Plaintiff wife appealed from that part of the interlocutory decree of divorce which awarded the property set out in the margin to defendant husband* 1 11and that part directing each party to deliver property to the other. Plaintiff was granted the divorce on the ground of cruelty. The single complaint she makes in her brief is that the court erred in awarding a Pekingese dog and a Volkswagen to defendant.

The court found that the Pekingese was community property. It is first asserted there was insufficient evidence to sustain the finding. The parties were married June 3, 1956, and…