Cargnani v. Cargnani
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Alameda County, and from orders denying a new trial, and denying defendant’s motion to require plaintiff to pay defendant’s costs and expenses of appeal. T. W. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The appeal is from the judgment and order denying the motion for a new trial and also from an order denying defendant’s motion to require plaintiff to pay said defendant’s costs and expenses' of appeal.
An interlocutory decree of divorce was granted plaintiff on the ground of extreme cruelty, and all the community property, including a homestead, was assigned to him absolutely. Defendant, in her answer, denied all the specified acts of cruelty charged by plaintiff, and she filed a cross-complaint setting up a cause of action against him for divorce on the ground also of extreme cruelty.
Of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Osborn v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Gay v. GayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Lamb v. HarbaughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Knight v. RocheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- LaMar v. LaMarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Independent Steel & Wire Co. v. New Mexico Cent. R.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
- Scoville v. KeglorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Angell v. AngellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Kyne v. KyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.