Legal Opinion

Hill v. Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 9, 1957No. Civ. 8951PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree of divorce granted for extreme cruelty. Appellant herein contends the apportionment of community property made by the trial court is unjust and asks this court to modify the judgment in that respect, and to instruct the trial court to enter judgment as so modified.

There can be no doubt that this court, as a reviewing court, is by statute given the power on appeal, and is charged with the duty on appeal, of changing the trial court’s disposition of community property if, from a review of the record, this court feels that the apportionment made is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. McKannay v. McKannayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Eslinger v. EslingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Nelson v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Kressly v. KresslySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Dallman v. DallmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. In Re Marriage of CaryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Muther v. MutherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Irish v. IrishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API