Legal Opinion

Reid v. Reid

California Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1896No. Sac. No. 7PublishedCited by 27 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County and from an order denying a new trial. M. K. Harris, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.

This is an action for a divorce brought by the wife against the husband upon the statutory grounds of extreme cruelty and willful neglect to pro*276vide the common necessaries of life. The defendant in his answer denied the material averments of the complaint; and, in a cross-complaint, charged against the plaintiff willful desertion and extreme cruelty, and upon these grounds prayed for a decree of divorce in his favor against her. The court found against plaintiff’s charges of extreme cruelty and neglect; and found that plaintiff was guilty of both desertion and extreme cruelty, decreed a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eslinger v. EslingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Strozynski v. StrozynskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Cameron v. CameronTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Title Ins. and Trust Co. v. IngersollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Allen v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API