Legal Opinion

McNeely v. Hiatt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 3, 1996No. 92CV105; 92PR019; 91PR048; CA A82252PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

Plaintiffs, the surviving grandchildren of Dollie and Zahnie Crockett, initiated this action to challenge the probate of the will of Dollie Crockett. Consolidated with this action is a separate proceeding in which plaintiffs sued Eva Hiatt, daughter of Dollie and Zahnie Crockett, in her capacity as personal representative of Dollie Crockett’s estate and as trustee of Zahnie Crockett’s revocable living trust. Plaintiffs alleged breach of fiduciary duty and prayed for the imposition of a constructive trust, an accounting and an award of attorney fees. Also consolidated with this action is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of ReddawayOregon Supreme Court · 1958
  2. In Re Southman's EstateOregon Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Lewis v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  5. Marshall v. FrazierOregon Supreme Court · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Biltmore Associates, LLC v. Twin City Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  3. Little Whale Cove Homeowners Ass'n v. HarmonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Swartsley v. Cal-Western Reconveyance Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. McNeely v. HiattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API