Legal Opinion
Rogers v. Rogers
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 21, 1984No. W81-265; CA A29816PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.
In this will contest, the trial court ruled that the will of Wallace Rogers, Sr. (decedent) could not be admitted to probate because it had not been attested as required by ORS 112.235(3). Anita E. Rogers, decedent’s surviving spouse, and Alda E. Hartfiel, 1 proponents of the will, appeal. Respondents, sons of decedent and contestants of the will, cross-appeal from the denial of attorney fees. We affirm.
The relevant facts are stipulated. On December 8, 1978, decedent signed the will in the presence of his wife, Anita, and his attorney, Thomas C. Hartfiel, and they saw decedent sign his will.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Deras v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State Land Board v. SovenkoOregon Supreme Court · 1954
- In Re Estate of FlickerNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
- In Re Estate of CrohnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1972
- United States National Bank v. First National BankOregon Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Matter of Estate of RoyalSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- Crook v. ContrerasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- In Re Estate of JungCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
- Matter of Estate of RohrichNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of Estate of PetersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.