Legal Opinion

McNeely v. Hiatt

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 14, 1996No. 92CV105, 92PR019, 91PR048; CA A82252PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiffs move for reconsideration or, in the alternative, clarification of our decision to award defendant costs for her appeal and to deny plaintiffs’ request for attorney fees. They request either that we change our decision not to award them fees or that we explain the basis for our decision not to do so. We allow the motion and adhere to our decision not to award plaintiffs attorney fees for the reasons that follow.

The facts of this case are quite complex and are set forth in detail in McNeely v. Hiatt, 138 Or App 434, 909 P2d 191 (1996). Suffice it to say that plaintiffs initiated this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rogers v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. McNeely v. HiattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. Jones v. KuhnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lumbermen's v. Dakota VenturesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Wedemeyer v. Nike Ihm, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API