Legal Opinion

Concentric Pumps, Ltd. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided August 1, 1986No. C.R.D. Court 84-10-01335PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum Opinion and Order

TSOUCALAS, Judge:

Plaintiff, Concentric Pumps, Ltd., brings this action challenging the refusal of the Customs Service to reliquidate 12 entries pertaining to oil and water pumps, and parts of fans. The Customs Service classified the merchandise under various items within Schedule 6, of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS). Consequently, the merchandise was liquidated at the ad valorem rate. Plaintiff contests this classification alleging that the merchandise contained American made parts and therefore, is entitled to be entered duty free under item…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hambro Automotive Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
  2. Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
  3. United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
  5. Computime, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Chrysler Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
  3. AT&T International v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
  4. NEC Electronics U.S.A. Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989
  5. Allied International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API