Legal Opinion
C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United States
United States Customs Court
Decided January 20, 1972No. C.D. 4327 Protest No. 70/1827-6305PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, Judge:
This matter is before me for determination pursuant to a motion by defendant for summary judgment by virtue of Rule 8.2 of the Rules of this Court. Plaintiff in its cross-motion also seeks summary judgment under said rule.
Defendant in' its motion attached a “Statement of Material Facts” as required by Rule 8.2(b) containing 14 paragraphs which read as follows:
1. The four entries embraced by this protest were appraised and liquidated as follows:
Entry No.
Date of Appraisement
Date of Liquldation
47409
May 20,1966
May 31,1966
5180
July 26, 1966
August 3,1966
1380
July 8,1966
July 14,1966
3437
July…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- American Automotoneer Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Jordan v. Brady Transfer & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- Terre Haute Paper Company v. PriceIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Savings Bank of Rockville v. WilcoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
3Cited by51 opinions
- Ford Motor Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Hambro Automotive Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- Itt Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.