Computime, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion and Order
RE, Chief Judge.
In this action, the plaintiff, Computime, Inc., challenges the refusal of the Customs Service to reliquidate certain solid state electronic timepieces and parts entered at the port of Laredo, Texas. The Customs Service classified the merchandise as watches, under item 715.05, TSUS, and as parts of watches, under various items of Schedule 7 of the TSUS. Plaintiff contests the classification, and contends that the imported merchandise is properly classifiable under item 688.45, TSUS, as “Electrical articles and electrical parts ... not specially…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hambro Automotive Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
- Mattel, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1974
- United States v. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1974
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972
- United States v. A. N. Deringer, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Aviall of Texas, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1994
- Black & White Vegetable Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Concentric Pumps, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Zaki Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Taban Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.