Legal Opinion

Alejandro v. Bell

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided August 22, 2002No. 13-01-00266-CVPublishedCited by 101 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Opinion by

Justice HINOJOSA.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order granting the motion for partial summary judgment of appellee, John D. Bell. By five points of error, appellant, Jesus Alejandro, contends the trial court erred in: (1) granting the motion for summary judgment and dismissing his lawsuit; (2) assessing sanctions against him because there is no evidence to support the sanctions; (3) refusing to rule on his objections to the summary judgment evidence; (4) refusing to rule on his special exceptions; and (5) granting the motion for summary judgment because it failed to…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. McConnell v. Southside Independent School DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  3. American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. GrinnellTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Natividad v. Alexsis, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by101 opinions

  1. Alaniz v. Hoyt, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. Ortega v. City National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  3. Franco v. Slavonic Mutual Fire Insurance Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2004
  4. R.M. Dudley Construction Co. v. Dawson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
  5. Meru v. Huerta, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004

96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API