Legal Opinion

In the Interest of W.E.R.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1984No. C-2773PublishedCited by 332 opinions

1Per curiam

In this cause of action the trial court denied a requested adoption. No findings of fact or conclusions of law were requested and none were filed. The court of appeals held, with one justice dissenting, that comments made by the trial judge at the conclusion of the adoption hearing amounted to a finding that the adoption was denied for the sole reason that the petitioner was a single man. Accordingly, the court of appeals reversed the trial court judgment and remanded the case for a new trial. 663 S.W.2d 887. Pursuant to Rule 483, Tex.R.Civ.P., we grant the writ of error and, without hearing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Renfro Drug Co. v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Lassiter v. BlissTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Buchanan v. ByrdTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Kinney v. ShugartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Rubey v. KuehnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by332 opinions

  1. BMC Software Belgium, NV v. MarchandTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Worford v. StamperTexas Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Kelly v. General Interior Construction, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Jampole v. TouchyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Fish v. Tandy Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1997

327 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API