Legal Opinion
Monroe v. Grider
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided August 8, 1994No. 05-93-00864-CVPublishedCited by 115 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BAKER, Justice.
Monroe sued Grider and Neal 1 for injuries she suffered when Neal ran into her with Grider’s golf cart. Monroe sued Neal for negligence and Grider for negligent entrustment of his golf cart to Neal. The trial court instructed a verdict for Grider on Monroe’s negligent entrustment claim. Grider requested rule 13 sanctions against Monroe claiming her negligent entrustment cause of action was groundless and brought in bad faith. 2 The trial court ordered Monroe and her counsel to pay Grider’s attorney’s fees as a sanction for bringing the negligent entrustment claim. The…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Pool v. Ford Motor Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
- McGalliard v. KuhlmannTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- Golden Eagle Archery, Inc. v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Mattly v. Spiegel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Estrada v. DillonTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- Randolph v. Walker, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
- Texas-Ohio Gas, Inc. v. Mecom, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.