Legal Opinion
Texas-Ohio Gas, Inc. v. Mecom
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
Decided August 23, 2000No. 06-99-00104-CVPublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
Justice GRANT.
This appeal arises out of a contractual agreement between Texas-Ohio Gas, Inc. and Olympic Gas Marketing for the sale of natural gas. Texas-Ohio brought suit against John W. Mecom, III, Robert N. Giles, and six other individuals, all of whom were employees and/or shareholders of Olympic Gas Marketing and its related entities (the Olympic entities). Texas-Ohio alleged that Mecom, Giles, and the other defendants were involved in a conspiracy that fraudulently induced Texas-Ohio to sell over $700,000 worth of natural gas to Olympic Gas Marketing, an insolvent…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Massey v. Armco Steel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- GTE Communications Systems Corp. v. TannerTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Texas Department of Corrections v. HerringTexas Supreme Court · 1974
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- R.M. Dudley Construction Co. v. Dawson, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2008
- in Re Mark Fisher and Reece BoudreauxTexas Supreme Court · 2014
- Sterling v. Alexander, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2003
- Kingston v. Helm, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2002
- ASARCO LLC v. Americas Mining Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.