Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Dickison
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 18, 1928No. 18510PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RILEY, ,T.
Lou Dickison, petitioner, was restrained of his liberty by M. C. Binion, chief of police of Oklahoma City, because of nonpayment of a fine and cost assessed against him in the municipal court of Oklahoma City, based upon violation of Ordinance 2740, as amended by ordinance 3057,. of said city.
Section l of ordinance 2740 reads as follows :
“There is hereby levied a license tax on the callings, trades, businesses, avocations- and occupations hereinafter named, in the following -sums respectively set opposite the-name of such calling, trade, business, avocation or occupation, to wit: *…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Gundling v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Royall v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Adams v. Standard Oil Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1910
- Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Apache Gas Products Corp. v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1973
- Ex Parte MarlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Farley v. WattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- City of Drumright v. Strand Amusement Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Grider v. City of ArdmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.