Legal Opinion
Grantham v. City of Chickasha
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 16, 1932No. 22609PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcNEILL, J.
This was an action filed in the district court of Grady county, Okla., for an injunction enjoining and restraining the city of Chickasha and its officers from enforcing ordinance No. 1032, of said city, which sought to levy a license tax on hawkers, peddlers, and itinerant merchants on the grounds that the ordinance was void and unconstitutional, and that the enforcement of same would result in irreparable damage to said plaintiffs.
The defendants filed a general demurrer to the petition. The trial court sustained said demurrer, refused to grant an injunction, and dismissed plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chalker v. Birmingham & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- City of Tulsa v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- In re IrishSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- City of St. Paul v. BriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Cook Coffee Co. v. Village of FlushingMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Ziperstein v. Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Cain's Coffee Co. v. City of MuskogeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.