Legal Opinion

Davis & Farnum Manufacturing Co. v. Los Angeles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 2, 1903No. 507PublishedCited by 149 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. This was a bill in equity filed in the Circuit Court for the Southern District of California by appellant, a citizen of Massachusetts, to restrain the city of Los Angeles and its officers from enforcing certain municipal ordinances, prohibiting the erection or maintenance of gas tanks or reservoirs within certain portions of the city.

Read the full summary

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. This was a bill in equity filed in the Circuit Court for the Southern District of California by appellant, a citizen of Massachusetts, to restrain the city of Los Angeles and its officers from enforcing certain municipal ordinances, prohibiting the erection or maintenance of gas tanks or reservoirs within certain portions of the city. The gravamen of the bill was that on September 1, 1901, Caroline W. Dobbins made a contract with the Valley Gas and Fuel Company, a California corporation, to build…

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Justice Brown,

after' making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court..1. As the bill iuThis case is based not only upon diversity of citizenship, but upon the alleged unconstitutionality of the municipal ordinances of November 25,1901, and March 3,1902, as impairing the obligation of Mrs. Dobbins’ contract with .the city under prior ordinances, an appeal lies directly to this court, and upon such appeal the whole case is opened for consideration. Horner v. United States, No. 2, 143 U. S. 570; Chappell v. United States, 160 U. S. 499. The State having delegated certain…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  4. Fitts v. McGheeSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Dodge v. WoolseySupreme Court of the United States · 1856

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Truax v. RaichSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. Douglas v. City of JeannetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Terrace v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Philadelphia Co. v. StimsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API