Legal Opinion · Dissent

Andreski v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1952Published

1DissentFairchild, J.

Viewed from the standpoint most favorable to the applicant widow, it would seem that this is a case where the commission might draw different inferences from evidentiary facts, and that the finding of the commission based upon an inference that is reasonably supported by the evidence cannot be disturbed by the courts on review.

In Ebner v. Industrial Comm. (1948), 252 Wis. 199, 201, 31 N. W. (2d) 172, this court stated:

“And if the facts are not in dispute, but permit of drawing a different inference therefrom, a question of fact and not a question of law is presented and the commission’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Green Valley Co-Operative Dairy Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Eckhardt v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Bowen v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API