Legal Opinion

State v. Bridgeforth

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1988No. CR-86-0308-PRPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLOHAN, Justice.

Defendant, Richard Wayne Bridgeforth, was convicted of nine counts of violating A.R.S. § 13-2310, scheme or artifice to defraud. He was sentenced to concurrent terms of 28 years’ imprisonment on each count. The Court of Appeals affirmed defendant’s conviction and sentences, modifying the commencement date of the sentence, State v. Bridgeforth, 156 Ariz. 58, 750 P.2d 1 (App.1986). We granted the defendant’s petition for review to consider whether a specific intent to defraud is an element of A.R.S. § 13-2310.

FACTS

In July, 1984, while serving a prison term at Fort Grant,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. BaileySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. United States v. PearlsteinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
  3. State v. ViaArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. RamosArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State v. MorseArizona Supreme Court · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Enterprise Leasing Co. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. State v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  4. State v. AverytCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  5. State v. WitwerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API