Legal Opinion
State v. Ramos
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided June 30, 1982No. 5489-PRPublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYS, Justice.
After a jury trial, appellant Cruz Oscar Ramos was found guilty of theft of property pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1802(A)(5) and was sentenced to a term of eight years. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. After denial of its motion for rehearing, the state filed a timely petition for review which we granted.
We take jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and 17 A.R.S. Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 31.19. The question presented is whether A.R.S. § 13-503, as amended, is violative of due process. Because we hold that the statute is not unconstitutional, we also address…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Powell v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Pope v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. LaffoonArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. StasioSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Montana v. EgelhoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- LaGrand v. StewartCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Warren Wesley Summerlin v. Dora B. Schriro, Director of Arizona Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- State v. MottArizona Supreme Court · 1997
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.