Legal Opinion
United States v. Pearlstein
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided April 21, 1978No. 77-1381; No. 77-1382; No. 77-1383PublishedCited by 113 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LAYTON, Senior District Judge:
Appellants were convicted of mail fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 1341.1 The primary issue raised by each defendant in this consolidated appeal is whether there was sufficient evidence adduced at their joint trial to sustain the jury’s verdicts against them. Because we conclude that there was not, we reverse.
Appellants Segal, Traister and Hannig were indicted along with three others for conspiracy and mail fraud. Count I of the thirty-four count indictment alleged that the six defendants, and a seventh unindicted confederate, conspired to use the…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Direct Sales Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Howard A. Blachly and Robert L. McMillen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Leo P. Reistroffer v. United States of America, W. L. Rogers v. United States of America, Marvin Norris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1958
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by113 opinions
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. Zweifel, Ronald O. Pelletier v. Gary D. ZweifelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. Michael C. CoyleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
108 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.