Legal Opinion

State v. Witwer

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 20, 1993No. 1 CA-CR 92-0200PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.

The defendant appeals from his conviction and sentence for sexual abuse, a class 5 felony. He argues that the trial court erred by failing to give certain jury instructions, although he did not request any of these instructions at trial. We conclude that none of the issues raised by the defendant constitutes fundamental error.

The facts, unless otherwise indicated, are viewed in a light most favorable to sustaining the conviction. State v. Zmich, 160 Ariz. 108, 109, 770 P.2d 776, 777 (1989). The victim, in June of 1990, started working part-time as a chiropractic…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. ZaragozaArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. State v. EncinasArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. ZmichArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. CountermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  5. State v. DiazArizona Supreme Court · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Dennis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. State v. GetzArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. United States v. Rosas-PulidoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. State v. KemperCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API