Legal Opinion
Thomas A. Kirkham and Norman W. Rosenberg v. Thomas Victor Arden and Gilbert William Merriman
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 25, 1963No. Patent Appeal 6974PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALMOND, Judge.
Kirkham et al., appellants, whose application, Serial No. 642,225, filed February 25, 1957, for alleged new improvements in Eleetrodialysis Process and Equipment, seek reversal of the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding priority of invention to Arden et ah, appellees, whose application, Serial No. 572,959, was filed March 21, 1956, for Eleetrodialysis Processes and Electrodialysis Cells.
The single count involved in this interference reads as follows:
“1. An eleetrodialysis apparatus comprising a plurality of juxtaposed multi-membraned units comprised of a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Special Equipment Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Field v. Knowles. Field v. KnowlesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1950
- Joshua C. Conner v. George G. JorisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1957
- Bowers v. ValleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1945
- Stenger v. HolmesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1939
3Cited by2 opinions
- Edward Fredkin v. Eugene H. IrasekCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1968
- Meitzner v. CorteCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976