Legal Opinion

Edward Fredkin v. Eugene H. Irasek

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 9, 1968No. Patent Appeal 7986PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WORLEY, Chief Judge.

Fredkin appeals from the decision of the Board of Patent Interferences awarding Irasek priority of invention in an interference between Fredkin patent No. 3,105,593 1 and an Irasek application. 2 Fredkin, as the junior party, has the burden of proving his case by a preponderance of the evidence.

The interference 'involves five counts corresponding to claims 1-5 of the Fredkin patent. The issues include whether the board erred in holding that the evidence Fredkin relies on to prove conception as to all the counts, and reduction to practice as to counts 1, 2 and 5, prior to…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mergenthaler v. ScudderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1897
  2. Land v. DreyerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. Anderson v. WalchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  4. Fernand Georges Bac v. Alfred L. Loomis, Andrew Alford v. Alfred L. Loomis, (Two Cases)Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1958
  5. Gerald C. Summers v. Charles B. VogelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Correge v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  2. Hazeltine Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
  3. Aelony v. Urs ArniCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  4. Wetmore v. QuickCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
  5. Ex-Cell-O Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1979

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API